Palmer Law Offices, P.C. Blog

The National Trial Lawyers is pleased to announce that Adam P. Palmer of the Palmer P.C. Law Firm in Phoenix has been selected for inclusion into its Top 100 Civil Plaintiff Trial Lawyers in Arizona, an honor given to only a select group of lawyers for their superior skills and qualifications in the field. Membership in this exclusive organization is by invitation only, and is limited to the top 100 attorneys in each state or region who have demonstrated excellence and have achieved outstanding results in their careers in either civil plaintiff or criminal defense law.

Attorney Adam Palmer represents Brunsman and Tennessee physician Livingston, who is being fined $1.5 million. The doctor was disciplined in 2001 in his own state for prescribing drugs through the Internet. Palmer said he believes his clients have done nothing illegal, and vowed to fight the fines in court if needed.

PHOENIX Magazine has named Jett Palmer of Palmer Law Offices a 2023 Rising Star in Personal Injury and Workers’ Compensation law, recognizing his outstanding legal results, client-centered approach, and growing influence in Arizona’s legal community.

Palmer Law Offices founder Adam Palmer has been named to PHOENIX Magazine’s 2023 Top Lawyers list for both Personal Injury and Workers’ Compensation, recognizing his legal expertise, client-focused service, and respected presence in the Arizona legal community.

Lawyers of Distinction is a private organization with no political ties and no plaintiff or defense bias. Lawyers of Distinction recognizes those lawyers who have been nominated by their peers as being amongst the best in their respective areas of practice in the United States.

1 Deborah S. Golob, a physician licensed by the State of Arizona, appeals the superior court’s judgment upholding a Decree of Censure and other sanctions imposed on her by the Arizona Medi-cal Board (the “Board”). The Board acted after finding that Dr. Golob had issued prescriptions over the internet without conducting a physical examination of the individual for whom the medicine was authorized or without previously establishing a physician-patient relationship. We reject Dr. Golob’s challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence and to certain statutes, and we therefore affirm the judgment against her.

June 04, 2001 By Berkeley Rice In Arizona physician who approved drug orders for an Internet pharmacy believed he was providing patients with “a good

“We think this is a complete vindication,” said Adam Palmer of the Phoenix, Arizona law firm Hendrickson and Palmer.

Adam Palmer told Arizona Capitol TImes that state law does not define the doctor patient relationship. The suit sought a temporary restraining order against the Medical Board’s action.